← Back to index

Hitting a Moving Target: Accounting for Acceleration

In our previous discussions, we assumed the target moved at a constant velocity. But what if the target is accelerating? This makes things a bit more complex, but still solvable. Here's how we can adapt our projectile aiming calculations to handle a target that's speeding up or slowing down.

The New Setup

We're still dealing with a projectile and a moving target, but now the target has an acceleration:

  1. Target 'a':
  2. Initial Position: (xa, ya, za)
  3. Initial Velocity: (vax, vay, vaz)
  4. Acceleration: (aax, aay, aaz) - This represents how the target's velocity changes over time.
  5. Projectile 'b':
  6. Initial Position: (xb, yb, zb)
  7. Speed: sb (We still need to find its velocity components)

The Challenge

The target's changing velocity means we can't use the simple equations from before. We need a new approach that takes acceleration into account.

The Updated Equations

We'll use the equations of motion under constant acceleration to model the target's position:

(1) xa + vax * t + 0.5 * aax * t² = xb + vbx * t (Matching x-coordinates) (2) ya + vay * t + 0.5 * aay * t² = yb + vby * t (Matching y-coordinates) (3) za + vaz * t + 0.5 * aaz * t² = zb + vbz * t (Matching z-coordinates) (4) vbx² + vby² + vbz² = sb² (Projectile's speed)

Let's break these down:

Solving the Equations

We now have four equations and four unknowns (vbx, vby, vbz, and t). Unlike the constant velocity case, we cannot isolate 't' and solve it separately. However, we can still try to reduce the number of variables in the system. We can re-arrange the equations (1), (2), and (3) to look like this:

(1) vbx * t = xa - xb + vax * t + 0.5 * aax * t² (2) vby * t = ya - yb + vay * t + 0.5 * aay * t² (3) vbz * t = za - zb + vaz * t + 0.5 * aaz * t²

Then, substitute these into equation (4) to remove vbx, vby, and vbz:

(xa - xb + vax * t + 0.5 * aax * t²)² + (ya - yb + vay * t + 0.5 * aay * t²)² + (za - zb + vaz * t + 0.5 * aaz * t²)² = (sb * t)²

This is a quartic equation in 't'. Quartic equations have a closed-form solution, but it's extremely complex.

Numerical Solutions

In practice, instead of using the complex quartic formula, numerical methods are used to find the value of 't'. These methods involve making educated guesses for 't' and iteratively refining them until a solution that satisfies the equation is found. Some common numerical methods include:

Once a value for 't' is found, we can plug it back into equations (1), (2), and (3) to find vbx, vby, and vbz.

Practical Considerations

In Summary

When dealing with an accelerating target, we need to use the equations of motion with acceleration and solve for the time of impact numerically. While more complex than the constant velocity case, this approach allows for accurate projectile aiming in dynamic game environments. Remember to consider the computational cost and choose appropriate numerical methods for your specific game's needs.